[HomeSite MapCIR Map]
Last updated on May 15, 2003

· Synopsis and 

· Proposal put to South Australian Government

Synopsis

PaulRofe QC, Director of Public Prosecutions, South Australia, refused to prosecute Corporate Affairs Commission Investigator, Barbara Thorpe, after the SA Police put to him that she had fabricated evidence and then committed perjury, by giving evidence in a Court that she had not edited the record of her interview of me, John Robertson. 

Rofe’s refusal caused Robert Semmens and John Robertson to be both wrongly jailed for two months, causing great damage to both. 

After his release from jail, Robertson called on Rofe twice, to ask why Rofe had not prosecuted Thorpe.Rofe replied that he had read Supreme Court Judge, Michael White’s Decision on Robertson’s Appeal from Magistrate Kelly and that Thorpe’s perjury made no difference to the outcome.Rofe invited Robertson to write a submission; this was done, but Rofe did not respond. 

White had earlier refused to accept the evidence of Thorpe’s Fabrication and Perjury and the Accounting Evidence of Robert Semmens.The Full Supreme Court, headed by King, rescinded Robertson’s Appeal, to thereby also refuse to consider the evidence of Thorpe’s crime and Semmens accounting. 

Barrister Simon Lane, under instructions from unknown people, used the mistakes of lawyers, investigators and others to maliciously fabricate the prosecution of Semmens and Robertson to create an effective defense to Claims for Damages that Robertson was in the process of making against people in the South Australian and Commonwealth Governments. 

The Whole House of Governments’ Cards would have collapsed (and will still collapse) if Thorpe was (is) prosecuted. 

Paul Rofe spearheaded this disgusting cover-up of Simon Lane’s Malicious Prosecution.. 

 

Anzac Day 2003

Look what I found on Google by searching for paul rofe prosecutor.read my two emails to Geoff Roach that follows – and his reply.

The Advertiser

 

GEOFF ROACH

 



 

'Yellow' journalism taints keen legal mind

22feb03

ADRIFT on the Gold Coast this week, we are not completely aware of how South Australians have reacted to the ambush of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Paul Rofe, by TV program Today Tonight

Having seen it here on Wednesday evening however, we would fervently hope that most people have been infinitely more appalled by the modus operandi of the program than any of the behaviour it portrayed. "Yellow journalism" was one phrase which came instantly to mind. So, too, did we consider "scurrilous and deceptive" to be the most apt description of the subsequent interviewing technique. To us – and, we understand, to many others – the entire episode, while cloaked in a veneer of public interest, smacked of an attempt by some entity, abetted by the program, to smear a prosecutor who had procured a guilty verdict in a particular murder case. Indeed, as the Henry Keough matter was given currency in the course of the interview – and as pro-Keough activists continue to pursue every avenue they can to overturn the considered verdicts of a jury and judges – it might well be thought that this was the crux of the set-up. 

If so, the instigators can feel pleased. Paul Rofe, a decent, brilliant, hard-working and occasionally guileless and flawed human being, was surely made to look foolish and vulnerable. Knowing him as we socially, occasionally, do – though not having spoken to him in the interim – we believe Mr Rofe and those around him will have keenly felt the personal pain such snide techniques inevitably arouse. 

But they will be as nothing to the emotion and dismay invoked by the unsubstantiated inference that his $10 each-way bets might have in some way affected the carriage and administration of justice in SA. As, we hope, the legal fraternity will have already substantiated en masse, Mr Rofe has long recruited and given great responsibility to some of the keenest, most dedicated legal minds available. 

And just as Mr Rofe has spent countless evenings and weekends reviewing and recommending process since a serious stroke limited his once formidable courtroom capacity, so has his team performed unstintingly to ensure justice is done in every single instance in SA. 

If there is any consolation for Mr Rofe and his magnificent team, it might be realising that public figures everywhere are now receiving the same sort of treatment from the media and elsewhere. 

PEOPLE here were saddened this week to learn that the 25-year marriage of Queensland Government Tourism Minister and Member for Currumbin, Merri Rose, had ended under the strain of unprecedented attacks from what she has described as "a disgruntled network of cronies in the racing industry". 

"They have tried every dirty trick in the book, to the circulation of patently inaccurate information, forgery and highly defamatory material about me," she told Parliament. "But I have a message for the cowards who hide behind respectability. I will not be diverted or stopped from making the reforms the Queensland racing industry so desperately needs." 'Nuff said. 

roachg@adv.newsltd.com.au

Email response 1

----- Original Message ----- 

Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:52 PM

Subject: Paul Rofe

Geoff,
 
 

John Robertson here.  Just came across your 'Yellow' journalism taints keen legal mind


I have lived in Essex for the past 4 years and before that in Far North Queensland for 10 years and I know almost nothing of the Henry Keough matter.  I do know Rofe though, and a spell in jail for him would be fair justice.

 
 

Rofe is corrupt.  Corporate Affairs Corporation Investigator, Barbara Thorpe, interviewed me and then rewrote some pages of her record before having it typed.  Then in a criminal trial of me she told Magistrate Kelly she had not edited her handwritten notes. 
 
 

The Police investigated and with forensic evidence put the case to Rofe for prosecution.  Rofe refused so I went to jail for two months.  Cadell was OK but the criminal conviction was a defense against major claims I was preparing against the SA and Com. Governments.
 
 

You can read more if you want to on http://www.robertsonj32.freeserve.co.uk/Synopsis.htm
 
 

I see Rofe has had a stroke; 'so has his team performed unstintingly to ensure justice is done in every single instance in SA'.  Geoff, you have to be kidding!  Thorpe is caught out fabricating evidence and committing perjury yet I go to jail and she stays free!
 
 

SA is uncivilised, Zelling J was reported saying this in the Advertiser on January 16, 1979 under the heading, 'Appeals deserve the fullest check: judge'
 
 

Nothing has changed since 1979.  SA is a disgrace. SA prosecutes when it should not and does not prosecute when it should.
 
 

Why not see if one of Rofe's team will email me with the purpose of resolving this Thorpe/Robertson Matter. 
 
 

I don't want Thorpe jailed, all I want is my conviction quashed so I can start off by suing Simon Lane for Malicious Prosecution.  Simon is not sick and it is about time this whole affair became public. 
 
 

Thanks for your Rofe story,
 
 

John Robertson

Email response 2

----- Original Message ----- 

Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 3:57 PM

Subject: Paul Rofe

Geoff,
 
 

Your article, 'Yellow' journalism taints keen legal mind', reminds me that I have had the benefit of conversing with several keen legal minds: John Bray, Keith Sangster, Brian Cox, John Doyle, Bob Fisher, Ian Ward, Lionel Murphy and William Deane come to mind. 
 
 

Yes, I think you are right, Rofe has a keen legal mind; that explains his non-prosecution of CAC investigator, Barbara Thorpe.
 
 

When I phoned Ward to tell him of the summons served on me he answered without hesitation that that was the defense to my civil claims that Ward and I were working on.  Later, when I told Ward that I did not have access to documents that I needed for my defense, Ward crossly told me that I would lose.
 
 

Assuming Rofe has a legal mind approaching Ward's, he would just as quickly have seen that his prosecution of Thorpe would lead to my retrial and a finding of my innocence.  That would have cleared the way for me to gain damages from CAC/Simon Lane for Malicious Prosecution.  So Rofe refused to prosecute Thorpe.
 
 

You wrote, Paul Rofe, a decent, brilliant, hard-working and occasionally guileless and flawed human being, was surely made to look foolish and vulnerable.
 
 

I challenge 'decent' in your description.  Rofe supported his fellow wrong-acting public servants and let two innocent private enterprise men be jailed and financially damaged. 
 
 

South Australia is tainted by Rofe and all of the public sector people he is covering up for.
 
 

A fine legal mind is not enough for anyone doing Rofe's job; integrity is essential.  Whatever you saw on TV is nothing compared with the whole truth.  I only have knowledge of my own case, but based on that, nothing in the SA Legal World would surprise me.
 
 

As Zelling J. put it in the Hinton Matter, 'The doing of justice between the State and the accused person is a matter of primary importance in any community which considers itself civilised and I cannot think that any of the excuses that have been suggested justify the present state of affairs in this State.'
 
 

You're Uncivilised in SA, Mate!   If you disagree, please debate.
 
 

Regards,
 
 

John Robertson 

Email reply

----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Roach, Geoff" <roachg@adv.newsltd.com.au

To: "'John Robertson'" <john@robertsonj32.freeserve.co.uk

Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 2:45 AM 

Subject: RE: Paul Rofe 

> John: : It's difficult to debate anything when I have no idea of the subject 
> matter. Perhaps the matters you refer to occurred during one of my 
> occasional long absences from the State but I genuinely have no knowledge of 
> them. Regards, GR. 

**************************************************

Proposal put to South Australian Government

Hon. Mike Rann MP 
Premier of South Australia

May 15, 2003

Dear Premier,

I refer you to the draft report of the Economic Development Board (EDB) at http://www.oed.sa.gov.au/DRAFT%20PLAN%20PDF.pdfand my web page http://www.robertsonj32.freeserve.co.uk/BusinessPlan.htm

Summary of Business Plan

The slow way to achieve the objectives is to use Multi-level Marketing methods to gain a large number of people to lobby and vote for the Business Plan to be adopted. 

The Fast Track is to put to the South Australian Government that there be a prompt out of court settlement for the damage suffered by Robert Semmens and me for the Nonfeasance of Paul Rofe, see http://www.robertsonj32.freeserve.co.uk/Synopsis.htm.

Just suppose your legal advisers see that it is sensible to settle this matter out of court then I suggest my damages are settled with a grant of freehold land and that Robert Semmens makes his own proposal for his settlement.

With the necessary land secured I undertake to immediately proceed with the pilot Hydrogen Scheme as perhttp://www.robertsonj32.freeserve.co.uk/BusinessPlan.htm

My South Australian Agent is Robert Semmens at<robert@accessit.net.au>

Speaker Peter Lewis knows Semmens and me and of the Paul Rofe matter, clickhttp://www.robertsonj32.freeserve.co.uk/CIR(Citizens_Initiated_Referenda)/PeterLewisToGriffinAttorneyGeneral.htm

Sincerely 

John Robertson

[ Next: Case History – Davies Spin]
[HomeSite MapCIR Map]


E-mail your comments about this site to JohnRobertson@freedomsolution.info