·         6. Robertson Email to SA Governor 21 May 2003 and Reply         Return to Index

 

I was not able to earn money on the internet to pay for legal advice so I sent this email. 

----- Original Message ----- 

From:Government House (GH)

To:'J R Export'

Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 11:42 PM

Subject: RE: Correction of link - Experience 8 The Takeover of South Australia 

 

Thank you for your emails.  To enable us to reply to you by mail, would you mind supplying a postal address.

 

Thank you,

 

Jeanette
Personal Assistant to the Official Secretary
Government House

Phone: 8203-9821

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: J R Export [mailto:jr_export@yahoo.co.uk] 

Sent: Wednesday, 21 May 2003 10:05 AM 

To: govthsesa@saugov.sa.gov.au  

Subject: Economic Development/Corrupt SA Law

 

Her Excellency Marjorie Jackson-Nelson, AC, CVO, MBE,

Governor of South Australia

Government House 

GPO Box 2373  ADELAIDE SA 5001 
Email: govthsesa@saugov.sa.gov.au

Copies to All South Australian MP's,

Your Excellency,

 

Sometimes I amuse myself writing 'Pulse' and have just finished Experience 8 The Takeover of South Australia with the Quick Fix Party.   That leads me to herewith invite all SA MP's to leave their present Party, or cease being an Independent, to join the Quick Fix Party. 

 

I refer you to the draft report of the Economic Development Board (EDB) at http://www.oed.sa.gov.au/DRAFT%20PLAN%20PDF.pdf

 

This 10 year plan states at page 6 that there is no quick fix; I contest that.

 

The easiest way to get South Australia on the move again is for the Rann Government to properly look at the corrupt law in SA and to act accordingly.

 

To reduce my own Case example to its shortest form, we have Prosecutor Paul Rofe refusing to prosecute Corporate Affairs Investigator, Barbara Thorpe, for re-writing several pages of her hand-written record of an interview with me before having it typed, and then later, giving evidence to Magistrate Peter Kelly that she had not edited her hand-written record. 

The Police investigated and put the Matter to Rofe for prosecution; Rofe refused.

Part of Thorpe's editing was to delete pages that showed that I did not know the Five Companies Thorpe was investigating.  Now think about this.  I am a private enterprise person who was neither a Director nor a Shareholder of the Five Companies and I did not even know their names. 

 

After Thorpe later rewrote her pages where I told her I did not know the Five Companies, Simon Lane fabricated a prosecution of me, saying I aided and abetted Robert Semmens attempt to commit a company fraud.

 

My own companies were the Export Consultants for Partnerships that included the Five Companies.  The Partnerships were my clients but I was no part of them or of the Five Companies.

 

The Partnerships and the Five Companies did not attempt to commit fraud, but suppose they had, what was that to do with me?

 

Brian Martin QC, as he was, did not have the opportunity to argue this point before Magistrate Kelly because Thorpe denied point blank that she had edited her record and instead put forward a cock and bull story which Magistrate Kelly accepted.  It is all well recorded.

 

Thorpe also put into Court, evidence of Partnership debts but did not put the evidence of the Partnership payments.  I was not involved in the Partnerships or in the Five Companies and had no access to their records.

Please explain: 

1.why I went to jail for two months as a result of Rofe not prosecuting Thorpe for Perjury when the Five Companies had nothing to do with me and that is what Thorpe concealed. 

2.why this Matter has not already been sorted out and please tell me when it will be sorted.

3.How it can be safe for anyone to live in South Australia. 

If you want more information start with http://www.robertsonj32.freeserve.co.uk/SouthAusGovDefendsClaimByCovering-upMaliciousProsecution.htm

 

Sincerely,

 

Your seething victim of SA Law,

 

John Robertson

.

Next:  Conspiracy to fabricate before perjury 27 November 2003